All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. As to the gist of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) by the lower court, the Defendant asserts that the Defendant was too unfasible and unfair, while the prosecutor filed each appeal by asserting that the Defendant was too unfasible and unfair.

2. Even though the Defendant had been punished five times due to larceny, the Defendant committed the crime, and did not endeavor to recover the victims’ damage.

On the other hand, the defendant does not commit another crime against the crime.

There are many things.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the following facts: (a) the Defendant’s age, sex, and circumstances after the commission of the crime; and (b) the various conditions of sentencing specified in the instant case’s records and the theory of changes; and (c) there are no special changes in the trial, the argument that the Defendant

3. As such, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.