All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. As to the gist of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) by the lower court, the Defendant asserts that the Defendant was too unfasible and unfair, while the prosecutor filed each appeal by asserting that the Defendant was too unfasible and unfair.

2. Although the judgment defendant had a record of criminal punishment more than 40 times due to violent crimes, the defendant committed the crime of this case on the day when he was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment due to the crime of obstruction of business and assault, the victims do not want the punishment of the defendant.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the following facts: (a) the Defendant’s age, sex, and circumstances after the commission of the crime; and (b) the various conditions of sentencing specified in the instant case’s records and the theory of changes; and (c) there are no special changes in the trial, the argument that the Defendant

3. As such, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.