All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. As to the gist of the reasons for appeal (four months of imprisonment with prison labor), the Defendant asserts that the Defendant was too unfasible and unfair, while the prosecutor appealeded against each other by asserting that it is too unfasible and unfair.

2. The risk of repeating the crime of this case is high even if the defendant was sentenced to a fine and a suspended sentence on at least 15 occasions due to the same crime, even if he/she was sentenced to a suspended sentence, during the suspended sentence of the bodily injury.

On the other hand, the defendant did not focus on the degree of injury inflicted on the victim, compensation for damage to the victim, and agreed with the victim.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the following facts: (a) the Defendant’s age, sex, and circumstances after the commission of the crime; and (b) the various conditions of sentencing specified in the instant case’s records and the theory of changes; and (c) there are no special changes in the trial, the argument that the Defendant

3. As such, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.