1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. On June 13, 2012, the deceased E (FFs, hereinafter “the deceased”) complained of the pains by the left-hand bucks that occurred after water play before the lapse of the company, and applied G G G Galebsium (hereinafter “Defendant Council member”) operated by the Defendant. The Defendant diagnosed the deceased as a nearby bucker, diagnosed the deceased as a nearby bucker, provided electricity treatment and low-frequency physical treatment, and returned back to the deceased.

B. On June 14, 2012, the deceased returned home, and thereafter, returned to the Defendant Council member again, around 11:29. The Defendant confirmed that some of the parts of the deceased’s left buckbucks changed in blue color and the bucks were damaged by the bucks, and the dishing treatment was conducted on the ducks.

In order to treat antibiotics, the deceased was hospitalized for treatment, and around 17:10 on the same day, the left-hand bucks part were serious and the partial bucks were encouraged from the defendant to move to the higher hospital, and the deceased was moved to the Acheon-gu Street Hospital on the following day.

C. After that, around 05:00 on June 15, 2012, the Deceased was found to be duplicated on the floor of the sick room, and the deceased’s duplicating fee was reported to the 119 first aid unit and sent the deceased to the H hospital, but had already died.

The Deceased had been diagnosed with urology before a year, and urology was taken. However, as of June 13, 2012, the Deceased’s urology was measured at around 428mg/dl (the normal range of 80-110mg/dl; hereinafter the unit omitted) and on June 14, 2012, around 586 and around 20:46 on June 14, 2012, around 369.

E. The plaintiff A’s wife, the plaintiff B, and C are the children of the deceased.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, 5, 6, 18, 21, Eul evidence No. 15, Eul evidence No. 15, the result of the request for appraisal of medical records to Samsung Seoul Hospital Head of this Court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. 1 Plaintiffs’ assertion as to whether a mistake in the performance of physical therapy and negligence in the therapy has been neglected.