Text
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The status of the parties is the intention to operate a medical clinic within the Fran city located in Kimpo-si (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”), and the network G (hereinafter “the deceased”) is a patient who has undergone the health examination and treatment at the Defendant Hospital. The Plaintiffs are the deceased’s spouse, Plaintiff B’s father, Plaintiff C, D, and E as their bereaved family members.
B. On April 25, 2016, the Deceased’s internal care and treatment process 1) During the period of April 25, 2016, the Deceased complained of the heart and fluoral pain and symptoms continued, and was admitted to the Defendant Hospital. The Defendant provided the Deceased with a road map and provided the Deceased with education to avoid food and drink caused by a large area or vehicle, and then the primary general health examination (hereinafter “instant health examination”).
(2) After the Deceased received the notice of the results of the instant health examination, “the notice of the results of the cancer examination” and “the notice of the results of the cancer examination.”
The notice of the results of the instant cancer examination is required to be more than a simple function, to be further examined, to be actively controlled by non-scopic pressure, abnormal geological blood transfusions, and to be careful control over scopic blood transfusions. As a result of the blood examination, the notice of the instant cancer examination contains the following items: (a) the gross caller 208mg/dL (ordinary boundary), HDL- Caller 3mg/dL (the heart of a disease), GDL-L-Letterlol 129mg/dL (normal). The notice of the results of the said cancer examination showed that there were health risk factors in the field of scopic blood infections and non-scopic assessment, smoking, and physical exercise conducted by the government of the Republic of Korea, only the immediately preceding government of the Republic of Korea; and (b) there was a lack of health risk factors in the field of the foregoing cancer test.
3) From April 25, 2016 to September 22, 2016, the Deceased was admitted to the Defendant Hospital on six occasions. The Defendant diagnosed the Deceased as a mary hepatitis on the basis of the results of the marry test, etc., and prescribed a disguised drug, etc. for seven days on April 25, 2016, as well as on May 7, 2016, respectively.