Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was a person who was working as a mobile phone seller of the (State)C's mobile phone in Mapo City B, and had a mind to open a mobile phone in the name of the victims with the knowledge of the identity of the victim D and the victim E.

1. Forgery of private documents;

A. On November 18, 2013, the Defendant entered D’s name, resident registration number, address, and mobile phone number in the subscriber column of the application for joining the mobile phone at the aforementioned (C mobile phone sales store) mobile phone sales store, and signed D’s signature at the bottom of the said application for joining.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged a copy of the mobile phone entry application in the name of D, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

B. On November 20, 2013, the Defendant entered E’s name, resident registration number, address, and mobile phone number in the subscriber column of the application for joining the mobile phone at the aforementioned (C mobile phone sales store), and signed E’s signature at the bottom of the said application for joining.

As a result, the Defendant forged a written application for mobile phone entry in the name of E, a private document on rights and obligations.

2. Uttering a falsified investigation document;

A. The Defendant issued to LG Plus employees, who are not aware of the forgery at the time and place specified in paragraph 1(a) as if they were the document duly formed, one copy of the forged mobile phone entry application, as described in paragraph 1(a).

B. The Defendant issued one copy of the application for admission to a forged mobile phone as described in paragraph 1(b) to the LG Plus employee, who is not aware of the forgery at the time and place specified in paragraph 1(a), as if it were the document duly formed.

3. Fraud;

A. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 1(a) and at the same time, presented an application for joining the mobile phone in the victim DNA who forged the same as described in paragraph 2(a), by deceiving employees of LG Plus, and received and used one cell phone device.