Each public prosecution against the Defendants is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged in this case is as follows: (a) Defendant A and Defendant B are the mother and mother-and-child relationship; (b) Defendant C is the relationship living together with Defendant B’s pet; (c) around 09:30 on September 15, 2013, the Defendants attempted to drink with Defendant B’s female job offers victim E, etc. while drinking together with Defendant B’s female job offers victim E, etc. at the Defendant’s dwelling place located in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, and the victim was able to take care of the victim’s head; and (d) Defendant A was the opportunity for Defendant C to take care of the victim and go to the victim; and (e) Defendant B was the qui of the victim’s head to put the head into a saw with his head by cutting down the victim’s head, and Defendant B was the victim’s head, and Defendant C was the knish of the victim’s head, and each victim’s knish.

2. Determination and conclusion-finding, and the above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the same Act. According to the records, it is recognized that the victim has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the Defendants on July 10, 2014, which was the third trial date after the prosecution of the case.

Therefore, the prosecution against the Defendants is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.