Each of the instant public prosecution against the Defendants is dismissed.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. At around 22:00 on May 5, 2013, Defendant A argued that the victim B (here, 31) was not in in her husbands and Jeju-do travel with her husbands, and that the victim was not in her husbands during the conversation with the victim while the victim was divided into her husbands, and Defendant A assaulted the victim by breaking her head on the hand floor with her hand at one time and two hand with her head.

B. Defendant B’s Defendant A.

at the same time and place as provided in subsection (1).

As in the same paragraph, the victim was assaulted by the victim A (n, 44 years of age) and the victim was flicked, and the victim was flicked by both hands.

2. Each of the above facts charged is an offense falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the same Act.

However, according to the records, it can be acknowledged that the defendant of this case, who is in the position of victim B and A against the other defendant, expressed that he does not wish to punish each other after instituting the prosecution of this case. Thus, each of the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.