A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 20, 2017, at around 19:16, the Defendant: (a) recommended the Defendant to stop and return home to the F, a student at the same place, who was dispatched after receiving a report of 112 that there was a person drinking alcohol in front of a certified broker C’s e-mail located in B; (b) the police officer affiliated with the e-mail Police Station D, which called “Is U.S. C, Is the desire to bit son, Is the instant E, “Is the bit of bitch bit, Is the bit of bitch, Is the bit of bitch.”

Accordingly, the Defendant, who is a police official, interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported case E-12.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (report on CCTV verification for committing a crime);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act suspended execution (see, e.g., the confession and reflect of a crime, and the absence of any criminal record exceeding the same criminal record or fine);

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;