A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 16, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Assaults, etc.) and damaged property; (b) on January 16, 2016, the Defendant took a victim B (55 years) in front of the Gu Office among those located in the 36th day of the Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Jungwon-gu; and (c) moved the victim B (5 years old);

At around 19:40 on the same day, in the vicinity of the costm name located in 40, a day at the time of light lighting, the victim saw the victim as “Chewing feas, knick,” and the victim gets her hand, her hand, her hand, her hand, her hand, and her part of the cell phone installed in the taxi, and damaged the connection parts, etc. by leaving the victim her hand her hand.

Accordingly, the defendant committed violence against the victim while driving, and damaged one cell phone ophone with which the market price owned by the victim cannot be known.

2. Around January 16, 2016, the Defendant damaged the public goods by 5 digital digital lines, 5 Gyeonggi Mine Police Station type offices, and 1 computer monitors installed in the office that was arrested in flagrant offenders for the same reason as the above paragraph 1, and caused damage by breaking up two computer monitors, and breaking up other computer monitors on the book.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged two computer monitors, which are goods used by public offices, where the market price is unknown.

3. From January 16, 2016 to around 22:40, the Defendant’s insultd the victim D, who is a police official, committed an act of disturbance, such as cutting the garment, and destroying a computer monitor, which is a public water, at the office of the foregoing sports luminous police station from around 21:40, and the above paragraph (2). As the victim D, who was a police official, was prevented from doing so, the Defendant repeated the victim’s desire, such as “ging, chewing, smoking, and smoking,” and the victim’s hearing by the police officer and the civil petitioner.