logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.07.09 2015고단1234
폭행등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 15, 2015, around 21:40, the Defendant voluntarily moved to the Daegu Northern Police Station C District District, located in Daegu Northern District B, and on the case of assault against D that occurred around 21:20 on the same day.

The Defendant, who was the victim E (the age of 48) of the said C District, repeated desireed to send the said D to the said C District to the 119 first-lane, and she saw that “Is the low-income body dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium h.

The Defendant continued to use the victim's bucks, following E in the course of leaving the earth area, used buckbucks one time, and bucked with bucks, and used bucks, and assaulted each victim's bucks in front of the criminal charge of the Daegu Northern Police Station located in the Daegu Northern District and office at around 23:40 on the same day.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties of police officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to investigative reports (to attachCCTV images to them);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution [the scope of recommendation] that there is no basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties [the decision of sentence] [the defendant interfered with the performance of official duties of police officers by using violence], while the defendant does not focus on the degree of violence and obstruction of official duties, while the defendant does not repent of wrong facts while intending to commit the crime of this case, and there is no special criminal record except for the previous crimes for which 20 years have passed yet to elapse, the age, character and behavior of the defendant, and other matters.

arrow