The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. On October 2013, the summary of the facts charged, the Defendant stated that “The F is unable to receive technical qualification rating because the F police officer was in F, and the F is obtained by unlawful means,” at the circulation of resources and office of the C9th floor in C City around C, including the circulation of resources, the head of the environmental facility team D, and the officials in charge E.”

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the reputation of the victim F by openly pointing out facts.

2. The Defendant and his defense counsel’s assertion at the above date, time, and at the above place, stated that F was able to obtain technical qualification rating, and there was no such remarks.

3. Therefore, each of the witness E and D's legal statements, the prosecutor's statements about D's office, and the police's statements about E are written as evidence corresponding to the above facts charged.

However, the following circumstances, which are acknowledged by the record, i.e., ① even if the testimony of the above witness is based on the testimony of the witness, the witness is unable to memory the defendant accurately at the above date, time, and place; ② the 7th page of the record of the examination of witness E; ② the 10th page of the record of the examination of witness; ② the part which is clearly admitted in the testimony of the above witness is recognized by the defendant, ② the 11th page of the record of the examination of witness E; and “the police may receive such rating.”

“ How the police origin will have a career;

Does the degree itself talked at the Engineering Association itself is not itself wrong

“The witness’s statement of fact” in the crime of defamation is merely an expression of the 7th page of the record of witness E’s examination to the purport that it should not be understood as the 3 pages of the record of witness examination or how the 3rd page of the record of witness examination or how the 7th page of the record of witness examination should be recognized. This is nothing more than an expression of the Defendant’s opinion on F’s technical qualification grade.