logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.06.15 2016고정1279
위증
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 14:40 on April 21, 2015, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the injury case against Gwangju District Court No. 302, the said court No. 2015, 235, and 2015.

During the hearing, the Defendant “I was in the state of keeping Category E” in question of the Prosecutor’s “I was how I was going to know.”

Han 2 No. 12 Ka 3 Ka Ka Ka Ka Ka Ka Ka Ka Ka Ka Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha

I testified as ", as the prosecutor ", C, C, as the case may be, her chest."

The testimony “for example” was made to the question “.”

However, there was no fact that C was witnessing the chest.

Ultimately, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Legal statements of the witness C and D;

1. A copy of the police statement made against the accused (146 pages of the investigation records);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of the protocol of examination of witness (220 pages of investigation records);

1. Article 152 of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act that selects a punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The gist of the argument was that the defendant did not correctly witness the case at the time of the instant case, but at the time, D was clearly witnessed the area of the area of the area of the area of the area of the area of the area of the area of the area of the area of the area of the area of the area of the area of the area of the area of the area of the area of the area of the area of the area of the area of the area of the area of the area of the area of the area of the case.

The defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory, on the passive basis of the question "", and the defendant made a false statement against his memory.

shall not be deemed to exist.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, the following circumstances are revealed.

arrow