The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant at the center of the Sound Group C center in Chungcheongnam-do, the date of December 2014, did not manipulate the head of the community funds management account book to the victim D, but damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by pointing out the two pages of the community funds management account book before the complainant 7 to 8 years.

2. Since the Defendant denies the facts charged in the instant case that there was no such remarks at the above time and place from the investigation stage, the Defendant had a witness E, D’s each legal statement, and a police statement on D as evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case.

In that sense, all of the above evidence, excluding the witness E’s legal statement (i.e., evidence whose contents are D’s statement), is the content that the Defendant re-written the above statement from F to E (it is not clearly revealed in the police statement protocol about D, but D does not directly express the above circumstances, but it is the witness’s statement that the Defendant took the above statement from F, and the issue of this case is whether the issue of this case is credibility in the witness E’s statement.

I would like to say.

Accordingly, the following circumstances acknowledged by the record, i.e., (i) the defendant made a statement to the village residents around December 2008 that D damaged the above account books due to the dispute as to whether D and D damaged the village fund management account books in around 2008, but there was no additional dispute over D's 35,36 pages of the investigation record, and there was no additional dispute over it thereafter, and thus at the time of the charge of this case for which more than six years have passed thereafter, the defendant made the above statement.