1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s main claim is dismissed.

2. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) against the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff)

(a) annex.

1. Basic facts

A. According to the Land Survey Division drawn up during the Japanese occupation point period, C and D are as follows: 1912. (T and D, 45 years, respectively)

2. On December 23, 200, Pyeongtaek-gun E-Eup (referring to the same place as “F plane in Pyeongtaek-gun” before changing the name of the administrative district or “J plane in Jin-gun”) H 452 square meters of forests and fields (hereinafter “H”), I forest 1,199 square meters (hereinafter “I”; H and I collectively collectively referred to as “each forest of this case”).

B. On November 2, 1971, J and K (see, e.g., e., the grandchildren of the above D) completed registration of initial ownership of each of the instant forests in accordance with the former Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Ownership of Forest Land (No. 2111, invalidation, and hereinafter “Special Measures Act”) (see, e.g., A27-2).

C. (1) On February 21, 2008, L 924 square meters divided into H was divided into a L 923 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) and a M 1 square meters, respectively.

(2) On April 30, 1981, I was replaced with N 4644 square meters, and the N 4,450 square meters, which was partitioned, was divided into N 4,036 square meters on February 21, 2008 (hereinafter “instant land”) and P 245 square meters in total, O 245 square meters, P 119 square meters in size, Q 10 square meters in size.

J died on June 22, 1985, and only on February 17, 2016, J’s 1/2 shares out of each of the instant lands were four South and North Korean children, and the South and North Korean net T, three South and North U, V, and four South and North Korea Plaintiff A.

In reference, U seems to support the defendant's side, and V seems to support the plaintiff's side.

In addition, W, X, Y, and Z as the originator A9 and 10 are the wife and children of the network T.

Among them, the registration of ownership transfer has been completed due to the inheritance due to the division of agreement in the name of the plaintiff, who is a dead child.

E. On June 28, 2006, K died, and on November 28, 2006, K’s 1/2 shares in each of the instant lands were transferred due to the inheritance due to the division under the name of Nonparty R, who is a son of K on November 28, 2008.

F. On the other hand, D.C.

The remaining four lots of land divided as shown in the port (M 1m2, 245m2, P 119m2, Q 10m2, Q 10m2) are divided.