logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2018.11.28 2018가단200169
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 72,318,20 to the Plaintiffs and KRW 54,417,840 among them, from July 4, 2018 to July 17, 2018.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Lease 1 between the Plaintiffs and E, the Plaintiffs are the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant commercial building”).

(2) Around May 19, 201, F and Defendant D entered into a lease agreement with the Plaintiffs as of June 1, 201, including a lease deposit amounting to KRW 100,000,000 (in addition to value-added tax, KRW 10,000,000 per month), and the term of lease from June 1, 201 to May 31, 201.

3) From around that time, F and Defendant D operated a beer store in the instant commercial building. B. The lease contract between the Plaintiffs and Defendant C) Defendant C entered into an investment contract between E on December 3, 2012 between E and Defendant C, whereby Defendant C invested KRW 300 million in E, thereby receiving monthly payment of the sales amount of the said store’s sales amount.

In addition, Defendant C agreed to change the name of the lessee under the above lease agreement of E to Defendant C for the purpose of securing the claim for the return of the above investment amount.

2) Accordingly, on December 6, 2012, Defendant C entered into a lease agreement with the Plaintiffs regarding the instant commercial building with KRW 100 million, KRW 8 million per month, monthly rent (excluding value-added tax, KRW 10 million per month), and from December 6, 2012 to May 31, 2013, and on the same day, Defendant C paid KRW 100 million as part of the said investment deposit and deposit money to the Plaintiffs. 3) on May 31, 2013, Defendant C drafted a lease agreement with the Plaintiffs as the representative of Defendant C, to extend the said lease agreement by May 30, 2015.

Defendant C conspired with the Plaintiffs without Defendant C’s consent, and the said extension lease contract was forged, and the Defendant C acquired the claim for the return of the lease deposit.

arrow