logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.05.16 2018고정216
화재예방ㆍ소방시설설치유지및안전관리에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the general manager in charge of the overall management of B building as the manager of the building in Ansan-si.

(1) A person related to a specific fire-fighting object shall conduct a regular self-inspection of fire-fighting systems, etc. installed in such object or have a manager or technician prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Administrative Safety and Security conduct a regular self-inspection on such object or regularly inspect such fire-fighting systems, etc.

(1) The qualifications of persons subject to the classification of self-inspection of fire-fighting systems, etc. under Article 25 (3) of the Act shall be as specified in attached Table 1, and the standards for placement of inspectors shall be as specified in attached Table 2, and where a fire-fighting facility manager inspects it, standards for placement of inspectors shall be as specified in attached Table 2.

Enforcement Rules of the Act on Fire Prevention and Installation, Maintenance, and Safety Control of Fire-Fighting Systems / [Attachment 1] Classification and objects of self-inspection, qualifications of inspectors, frequency and timing of inspection (related to Article 18(1))

3. A comprehensive precision inspection shall be conducted according to the following classification:

(e)The time of the comprehensive precision check shall be subject to the following criteria:

1) Use of a building material shall be approved in the month of the approval date.

On May 2017, which is the month to which the approval date for the use of a building belongs, the Defendant conducted a self-inspection by the end of May 2017, but the Defendant did not conduct a self-inspection on the fire-fighting systems in B building.

Accordingly, the defendant did not make a self-inspection of the fire fighting systems in B building within the time limit.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report as a result of comprehensive close inspection;

1. Article 49 of the Act on the Prevention of Fire in Case of Criminal Facts, Article 49 of the Installation, Maintenance, and Safety Control of Fire-Fighting Systems Act, and Articles 25 (1) and 25 of the Act on the Safety Control of Fire-Fighting Systems, and selection of fines;

arrow