The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

The plaintiff is a corporation established for the purpose of passenger transport business, etc. and is a passenger transport service provider who operates urban buses (D., E, F., G., etc.) within B City with authorization from the defendant.

On November 2019, the Defendant received inconvenience and suggestions for public transportation in relation to H districts, I districts, J, etc. from the passenger transport service providers including the Plaintiff. Accordingly, the Defendant sent an official door to the request for submission of a separate project plan (e.g., the date of commencement on which consultation on neighboring local governments, vehicle withdrawal, etc. can be considered).

On November 27, 2019, the Plaintiff submitted a business plan to the Defendant on November 27, 2019: “The Plaintiff submitted to the Defendant a “the construction of the connecting route on the H district-related work hours G and the extension of the connecting route on the H/N north line” between the G stations, “the new establishment of the connecting route on the I district-related L station-related L station-related L station-related L station-related /K station-related /M station-related NN-related NN-related NN route extension of the connecting route on the H/N line.”

After examining the business plan proposed by the Plaintiff and C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “C”), the Defendant presented his/her opinion on December 27, 2019 that the village bus route (draft) within the H district proposed by C is reasonable.

On February 17, 2020, on the basis of Article 10, etc. of the Passenger Transport Service Act, the Defendant registered the modification of passenger transport business plan (hereinafter “instant disposition”) with the content of approving the new establishment of a community bus route A ( upper roads) and a community bus route No. O. B (under each of the above community bus routes), which operates the same route as the annexed route No. 1 on the basis of the annexed route schedule under Article 10 of the Passenger Transport Service Act.

The Defendant publicly announced the instant disposition on March 12, 2020.

[Ground of recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6 (including the number of branch numbers, hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 18, and the purport of the whole argument of the plaintiff as a whole, are the village bus routes of this case newly established according to the disposition of this case.