1. The change of the passenger transport business plan issued by the Defendant against Korea Passenger Transport Service Corporation on March 23, 2016.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiffs are high-speed bus transport business operators who obtained a license for passenger transport business from the Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport pursuant to Article 4 of the Passenger Transport Service Act (hereinafter “passenger Transport Service Act”), and currently operate the Seoul (high speed terminal)-Masan on 51 a day and the Seoul (Seoul)-Masan on 10 consecutive service routes.

B. On March 23, 2016, the Defendant added “Masan (Seoul)” to the intermediate stop of the existing route from Seoul (Seoul) to Dolwon-Gun, 384.6km, and twice (hereinafter “lane 1”), as indicated in [Attachment 1], the Defendant changed the order to improve the route from Seoul (Seoul) to west-Gun, 41.6km, and twice (hereinafter “second route”) to the two route (hereinafter “instant first disposition”), and the Intervenor considered the following [Attachment 2] to change the previous route from 5 to 400 to 500 to 400, 500 to 400, 500, 500 to 700, 500, 500 to 400, 500 to 100,0000, 500 to 40,0000, 500 to 7,000,000,000).

(hereinafter referred to as "each of the dispositions of this case" after combining each of the above dispositions). [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including the provisional number number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether each of the dispositions of this case is legitimate

A. According to Article 10(1) of the Passenger Transport Act with respect to the primary claim of the plaintiffs, the project plan is to be implemented.