logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.09.02 2015고단985
공문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and by a fine of two thousand won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Where a person who has obtained a license for passenger transport business violating the Passenger Transport Service Act intends to alter the business plan, he shall obtain authorization from the competent authority;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as the representative director of C (ju) operating community buses on three routes, Nos. 5, 5-1, and 7, with a village bus transport business license from the subordinate market, changed the Defendant’s business plan on October 2, 2014; and on October 8, 2014, without obtaining authorization from the competent authority; and on October 21, 2014; and on October 28, 2014, the route Nos. 5-1 was reduced by using the method of not operating the end stop to the end stop station; and on October 28, 2014, the Defendant arbitrarily changed the business plan, such as extending the operation of the route no. 5-1 to the end stop station.

2. On November 19, 2014, the Defendant forged public document documents, preparing a statement of opinion on the notification of the administrative disposition with respect to the transportation administration of the sub-city 5-1 at the office of the vehicle D above the vehicle D located atHanam-si, Hanam-si, and copying it after putting an indication of the failure on the pressure-resistant containers of the vehicle of a village shuttle 5-1, which operates the above 5-1 route, on the purpose of attaching it.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged one copy of the re-examination result of pressure-resistant containers in the name of the chief director of the Korea Transportation Safety Authority and the Gangwon-do Office of Devices.

3. At around 11:00 on November 19, 2014, the Defendant submitted a statement of opinion in accordance with a prior notice of administrative disposition in the Ministry of Transport and Maritime Affairs, 10Hanam-si, Hanam-si, Hanam-si, and the Ministry of Transport and Maritime Affairs (hereinafter referred to as “the Ministry of Transport and Maritime Affairs”) to the public official G who is aware of the forgery, issued the report as if the result of re-inspection of the forged E community bus vehicle was genuine

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The prosecutor's statement concerning G;

1. A written accusation;

1. A copy of the statement of opinion;

1. Test table of pressure-resistant containers;

1. Each public test of pressure-resistant containers shall be requested, and the fact inquiry shall be made;

arrow