beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.
However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendants joint criminal conduct (Interference with their friendliness) and Defendant B’s her relatives, and Defendant B’s her relatives and her relatives, and the main points operated by the victims E (27 years of age) in North Korea-Gu at port on April 6, 2016, when Defendant B her her friends to Defendant A’s her friend, and Defendant B her friends, and Defendant B her friends to Defendant A’s her friends, and Defendant B her friends to her friends, and her friends to her friends, and her friends to her body. Defendant A friends to her body while fighting with her body, her friends to her friend with his son and her friends to her friends, and her friends to friends.
Accordingly, the Defendants and C conspired with each other to interfere with the main business of the victim by force.
2. Defendant A
A. The Defendant damaged property damage by breaking up the advertising board equivalent to KRW 250,000,00 in the market price owned by the victim E, which was set up in front of the main points operated by the victim E, at the time and place described in paragraph (1).
B. On April 6, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties: (a) around 23:45, at the above main station, the police officers assigned to the police box of the Korea Coast Guard, who was sent to the police station of the Korea Coast Guard after receiving a report of 112 as described in paragraph (1), committed violence by plucking, plucking, breaking and breaking his arms; and (b) assaulting a policeman with his chest and shoulder by hand; and (c) the police officers assigned to the Korea Coast Guard Police Station of the Korea Coast Guard at the site one time at the time, interfered with the legitimate performance of duties pertaining to the handling of 112 reported cases.
3. Defendant B
A. On April 6, 2016, the Defendant sent to the scene of obstruction of performance of official duties after receiving a report of 112 as described in paragraph (1) from the above point of view.