The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the penalty imposed by the court below on the defendant (2.5 million won of a fine) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is based on the following facts: although the defendant's mistake is recognized, his depth is against the defendant's living situation is extremely difficult, and there is no record of being subject to the punishment or heavier punishment than a fine for the same kind of crime; however, considering the above circumstances of the defendant, it appears that the court below already sentenced to a fine of KRW 2.5 million reduced by a fine of KRW 3 million pursuant to a summary order. Each of the crimes of this case by the defendant is likely to damage the public trust in the family relationship information processing system, which is a public electronic record, and hinder the state's immigration control, as well as to cause serious danger of causing social problems by mass production of illegal aliens through disguised marriage. Thus, there is a serious need to strictly punish them, and considering the motive and circumstance leading up to each of the crimes of this case, the defendant's age, character and conduct, occupation, occupation, family relation, etc., the punishment of the defendant is too inappropriate.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.

However, in the summary of the evidence of the court below, the "1. report on the arrival of internal investigation and report on the arrival of internal investigation" on 1.0, and the "Article 229 and Article 228 of the Criminal Act" in the "Article 228 of the Criminal Act" in the "Article 229 and Article 228 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime of 1.0" in the application of the law is clear that it is an error in the "Article 229 and Article 228 (1) of the Criminal Act". Thus, it is corrected

.