The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., a fine of 1.5 million won) imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are favorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant's mistake is recognized, the crime of forging official document, etc. for which the judgment became final and conclusive, and the fact that equity should be considered in the case where each crime of this case was adjudicated simultaneously. However, considering the above circumstances, the court below had already rendered a reduction of 1.5 million won above the amount of fine determined by the initial summary order in consideration of the above circumstances, and there is no change in circumstances at the trial. Meanwhile, each of the crimes of this case is not less than the nature of the crime in light of the type of crime, etc., and the role of the defendant was important in each of the crimes of this case. The crime of this case is important. The crime of this case is likely not only to damage the public trust in the family information processing system, which is a public electronic record, to hinder the national legitimate immigration duties, but also to cause social problems by massing illegal aliens through a disguised marriage, and thus, there is no reason for the court below's imposition of punishment too unreasonable.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per

[However, in accordance with Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, each last sentence of Article 1 and Article 25(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act (including the following parts and attached list) of the judgment below is deleted, and the application of the statute is "the point of false entry in the original notarial deed".