Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the sentence against the defendant A for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on November 29, 2017, on the grounds of special assault, etc. in the support of Suwon Friwon, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 7, 2017.

Defendant

B On May 30, 2013, upon having been sentenced to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thief) at the Suwon Gan prison on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes on May 30, 201, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on June 11, 2014.

[Criminal facts] The Defendants are not narcotics handlers, and thus, cannot sell, sell, or administer Metepha clograms (one philophones; hereinafter “philophones”) which are local mental drugs.

1. Joint crimes committed by the Defendants

A. On November 2016, 2016, Defendant A bears the purchase price of phiphones, and Defendant B conspireded to purchase phiphones by communicating with a seller on the Internet in contact with a seller.

Accordingly, Defendant A delivered KRW 500,000 of the purchase price of opphones to Defendant B, and Defendant B decided to purchase opphones from a person who sells the nameless phone that he came to know through the Internet, and around 19:00 to 20:00 of the same day, Defendant A issued 50,000 won to a seller of opphones at a neighboring house in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, and issued opphones to the seller, and 0.35g of opphones from the seller.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to purchase philophones from the seller of the name in secret.

B. On April 3, 2017, around April 3, 2017, the Defendants: (a) around April 3, 2017, Defendant A bears the purchase price of phiphones; and (b) Defendant B conspired to purchase phiphones by communicating with a seller of phiphones via the Internet.

Accordingly, Defendant A delivered KRW 800,000 to Defendant B the purchase price of phiphones, and Defendant B decided to purchase phiphones from a person who sells a nameless phone known to Defendant B via the Internet, and then Incheon C around 18:00 on the same day.