1. The Defendant: (a) from May 17, 2019 to Plaintiff A, the amount of KRW 31,568,720; (b) KRW 15,00,000; and (c) each of the said amounts.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On May 20, 2014, Plaintiff A, the wife of Plaintiff B, as the first child, had confirmed the pregnancy of the second child (hereinafter “the instant fetus”) conducted by the Defendant, and had the child undergo a medical examination on a regular basis after receiving the medical examination from the Defendant. After having confirmed the pregnancy of the second child, Plaintiff A, the wife of Plaintiff B, the first child, was in the body of the fetus through the undergo of the examination, the first part, the first part of which was conducted by the Defendant (hereinafter “the instant fetus”).

B. At the time of the commencement of the above medical examination, Plaintiff A, at the time of the commencement of the above medical examination, was receiving an infection therapy and infection therapy to the Defendant, first, at around 32 weeks of early pathology in the birth process of A, and first, informed the Defendant of the experience of early childbirth around 36 weeks.

C. On December 9, 2014 (the 32th day of the new shares), Plaintiff A filed an appeal for the helper, such as a refluence, with the Defendant. The Defendant hospitalized Plaintiff A after the fetus Non-A’s examination (NST), and subsequently hospitalized Plaintiff A, the Plaintiff’s hospitalization at the Plaintiff, thereby administering the laba, etc., which is a self-fluence system, and observed the progress of lurging, and discharged Plaintiff A on or around the 13th day of the same month.

Plaintiff

A, on December 23, 2014, filed an early exhaustion with the Defendant, claiming for the early exhaustion of the instant fetus, and the Defendant, after the examination of the Plaintiff A and the instant fetus, conducted the king operation schedule around January 12, 2015.

E. On December 30, 2014, Plaintiff A filed an early appeal to the Defendant for the early exhaustion with the instant father and wife, and the Defendant prescribed that Plaintiff A had an early appeal to the Defendant.

F. On January 5, 2015, Plaintiff A was subject to a urine test and veST test (NST) on the part of the instant father’s disease, and Plaintiff A’s blood relative increased to 300 after food. However, with respect to the instant fetus, it is deemed that Plaintiff A did not have any vegetable test, such as identifying the symptoms of 3.8 to 3.9kg in the predicted body, scarbbling, and scarbling, and symptoms of scarbling, etc. of scarb with the fluent body.