logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.18 2014가합564868
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Defendant: 10,000,000 won to Plaintiff B, and 5% per annum from September 7, 2011 to July 18, 201, respectively.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. 1) The parties concerned were given birth to the Plaintiff C at the I Hospital operated by the Defendant on the H date, and the Plaintiff A is the husband of the Plaintiff B and the father of the Plaintiff C, and the Plaintiff D is the Plaintiff’s grandparent, the Plaintiff E, and F are the Plaintiff C’s grandparents. 2) The Defendant is a corporation that establishes and operates the I Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”). The Defendant is the employer of the Defendant hospital, including the J et al., who was the principal doctor of the Plaintiff B.

B. On October 21, 2008, Plaintiff B, the first day of Plaintiff B’s medical history, and the first day of Plaintiff B’s medical care at Defendant Hospital, the first day of Plaintiff D, the part of Plaintiff D (at the time of her birth, if her birth was born, her birth was born, her birth was born. 2) Plaintiff B was pregnant and was under pre-delivery examination, and her pregnancy was conducted on July 21, 201, the fifth day of 201 when Plaintiff B was receiving medical care from her father and her medical specialist at Defendant hospital, and expressed that Plaintiff B was her BAC, Vagleth Af Chure, the first day of the king, and the second day of the king, the second day of the king, and the first day of the her birth was provided to her father and her medical specialist at Defendant hospital. The Plaintiff B expressed her intention to KRW 10 million (hereinafter “b million”).

C. On September 5, 2011, the 201th day of pregnancy, Plaintiff B hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital only for the boom inducement, which is the 38th day of pregnancy, and the Defendant Hospital’s medical personnel did not have a brush axis at the time, and thus, the Defendant Hospital’s medical personnel analysis the movement of the fetus to the Plaintiff B, in response to the movement of the fetus, that is, the change of the heart of the fetus, in response to the movement of the fetus, and that is, the change of the heart of the fetus, by objectively analyzing the movement of the fetus, that is, the movement of the fetus, in response to the movement of the fetus, that is, the movement of the fetus, the two entry reduction devices of the body of the mother of a mountain mother, the device of monitoring the heart heart and the bombing system of the baby and the bombing system of the mother to monitor the heart operation of the fetus, and to reflect the results of the inspection of the fetus as normal.

1. The attachment shall be made on the same day.

arrow