1. The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff A received medical treatment at the “E dental clinic” (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”) operated by the Defendant, and the Plaintiff B is the spouse of the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff C and D are the children of the Plaintiff.

B. On September 3, 2012, Plaintiff A filed an appeal for pains No. 7 on the right-hand side of the bad faith with Defendant Hospital, and the Defendant injected Masando Madrop (1:100,000) (hereinafter “the instant anesthesia”) and treated the hump treatment.

C. On the 7th day of the same month, Plaintiff A, at the Defendant Hospital, complained of constant pains on the right-hand 7th day of the same month, and the Defendant explained to Plaintiff A about pathy, and explained to Plaintiff A about pathy, and obtained Plaintiff A’s consent, and then Plaintiff A injected the instant anesthesia, and then Plaintiff A’s pathy right-hand 7th day of the music of Plaintiff A.

Plaintiff

A completed the treatment and calculated the treatment costs, and thereafter, the defendant hospital was in the nearby department stores, and thereafter, it was seen and used in the emergency room of the hospital of the 1,00 local university, but the patient was in the emergency room of the hospital of the 190 local university, but he was returned to the hospital without receiving the treatment at the same time.

E. From the 10th of the same month to October 29 of the same year, the Plaintiff A was hospitalized in the Suwon Central Hospital due to physical condition, high blood pressure, blood circulation disorder, fluoral dysium, electric shock, etc.

[Ground of recognition] Evidence Nos. 1-1, 2-2, A2-1 through 3, A3, A5-1, 3, 4, and 6-2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the plaintiffs' assertion

A. The plaintiffs asserted that the plaintiff A suffered from the A-board disease with the heart of the defendant and the A-board disease.

However, without considering the side effects of the instant narcotics, the Defendant injected the instant narcotics to Plaintiff A without considering the side effects of the instant narcotics, and the Plaintiff A was dead due to the side effects of the instant narcotics.

Plaintiff

A on September 7, 2012, there is no other reason to cause symptoms, such as real body, high blood pressure, blood cycle disorder, influorite, and overall decline, in addition to the injection of the anesthesia in this case.