Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

Defendant

A fails to pay the above fine; 50.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a representative who operates B, a motor vehicle engine parts manufacturing company, which is located in C 102 in the event of Gyeonggi C.

When a foreigner intends to be employed in the Republic of Korea, he/she shall obtain the status of sojourn eligible for employment, and no person shall employ any person who has no such status of sojourn as above.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, after receiving a subcontract for the manufacturer of motor vehicle parts from the “E” located in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, the Defendant employed F (G) who is a four arms foreigner with no status of sojourn eligible for employment after the lapse of the period of stay from July 2, 201 to January 31, 2013, on the ground that there is insufficient human resources to meet production.

In addition, the Defendant employed 13 foreigners who did not have the status of stay to work 13 times in total, such as the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.

2. Defendant B, a corporation established for the purpose of manufacturing automobile engine parts, etc., and A, the representative of the Defendant, committed a violation as described in paragraph (1) in relation to its business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. A written statement of F, etc.;

1. Accusation of immigration offenders, decision on examination by the Ministry of Justice, business registration certificate, and notice of decision on examining immigration offenders;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report and accompanying documents;

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

A. Defendant A: The phrase “Article 94 subparag. 5-2” as stated in the indictment under Article 94 subparag. 9 of the Immigration Control Act is corrected to the new law that the former law is applied.

Article 18(3)

(b) Defendant B: Subparagraph 2 of Article 99-3 of the Immigration Control Act, Article 94 Subparag. 9 of the Immigration Control Act, and Article 18(3) of the same Act

1. The defendant A, who is selected to impose an alternative fine, has only a history of punishment of a fine of two million won per time in the previous department, and must not repeat again, and the circumstances leading to the crime, etc.