logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2014.08.22 2014고정1126
출입국관리법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

Defendant

A fails to pay the above fine; 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is a company that operates the glass manufacturing business, etc., and the defendant A is the representative director of the above company.

1. No person who is a defendant A shall employ any foreigner having no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities, as prescribed by Presidential Decree;

Nevertheless, from April 20, 2013 to July 8, 2013, Defendant A provided employment of Pakistan (33 years of age) with monthly wage of KRW 1.5 million, where Defendant A did not have the status of stay to work at the place of business in Ulsan-gun C, a stock company located in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Seoul.

2. Defendant B Co., Ltd. employed Defendant A, the representative of Defendant B Co., Ltd., who did not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment as described in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each accusation;

1. A certificate of employment of foreigners;

1. The standard list of registered foreigners;

1. Application of statutes governing certified transcript of corporate register;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

(a) Defendant A: Article 94 Subparag. 9 of the Immigration Control Act, Article 18(3) and (1) of the Immigration Control Act (Selection of Fines);

(b) Defendant B: the main sentence of Article 99-3 and Article 94 Subparag. 2, Article 94 Subparag. 9, and Article 18(3) and (1) of the Immigration Control Act

1. Defendant A at a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the provisional payment orders;

arrow