1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative director of corporation B, and the defendant corporation B is a corporation established for the purpose of the business of the branch office in the Ssung City.

1. The defendant A shall not employ a person who does not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities, but the defendant shall from June 25, 2014 to the same year;

7. By the end of 30.30., the Vietnamese Nationality D (D) that did not have the status of stay eligible for job-seeking activities in Co., Ltd. B, Inc., in the period of harmony, was employed by a person who had no status of stay eligible for job-seeking activities as shown in the attached list of crimes around that time.

2. Defendant B, at the same date, at the same time and place as “paragraph 1”, employed a person who was the representative director of the Defendant and did not have the status of sojourn that 11 of the Defendant’s business to engage in job-seeking activities as “paragraph 1.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Accusation of an immigration offender;

1. Written opinion, written decision, and written confirmation of foreign employment;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each notice of decision on examining an immigration offender;

1. Defendant A: Article 94 subparagraph 9 of the Immigration Control Act, Article 18 (3) of the Immigration Control Act, Article 99-3 subparagraph 2 of the Immigration Control Act, Article 94 subparagraph 9 of the Immigration Control Act, and Article 18 (3) of the Immigration Control Act;

1. Defendants from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant A: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B corporation: Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;