logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.04.23 2014나12800
부당이득금
Text

1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and all other parts of the judgment of the court of the first instance except for dismissal, addition, or deletion as follows, are the same as the reasoning for the judgment of the court of the first instance. Thus, it is citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

【The portion to be removed, added, or deleted】 Part 3, Section 7, “The ownership of three households and one of them shall be deleted.”

Part 3, in front of "ownership" in Part 8, "three households among them and one of them shall be added."

Part 4, "new time" in Part 9 shall be raised as "the voting time".

Part 4, "In light of light of light, light, and light, light, light, and light, light, and light."

The 7th page 5's "walthing" shall be considered as "walthing".

Part 5-6 of the 13th page "The defendant's request is made 15 days after the completion of the lawsuit on the site right" shall be deemed as "the day following the expiration of 15 days from December 2, 2013, the date on which the plaintiff's site right registration has been made on this case."

2. If so, the plaintiff's main claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the defendant's counterclaim is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow