logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.03.24 2016누63875
국유재산 사용허가 철회처분 무효확인 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. The first instance court;

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except for the dismissal or deletion of the following contents among the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(1) The “F” in Part 3 9 shall be raised to “H”.

(2) Face 3, 12, “as described in the following table” shall be deleted:

③ On the 4th page 10, the phrase “each of the instant usage fees” (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant usage fees”) shall be read as “each of the dispositions listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as “instant usage fee imposition disposition”).”

(4) Sections 4 and 14 shall be deleted.

(5) On the 5th page 1, the term "disposition imposing user fees" shall be deemed to read "disposition imposing user fees and disposition imposing late fees".

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's primary and conjunctive claims are all dismissed as they are without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow