logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.07.16 2015나1036
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, since the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance other than to dismiss or delete part of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is citing it as it is by the main text of Article 420

【The part to be cut off or deleted” of the second page 7-8 of the second page 7-8, “A (Representative D) leased the instant digging pool from C (Representative D), a company leasing heavy equipment at the beginning of May, and then C leased the digging pool from a rental company in the early of May, 199.”

No. 2, 15-16, “The tree was operated by operating the so-called so-called scoper to operate the so-called scoper, and the tree extracted as above.”

The third-party first-Class 1 behavior " and has the plaintiff" and the plaintiff "shall require approximately three weeks of medical treatment."

The crime of injury by occupational negligence in Chapter 4 of the Act shall be the crime of injury by occupational negligence.

In Part 3, the term “inter-section 6” shall be deleted.

Part 3-9 "each entry of evidence of heading A1 through 8, 11, 16 through 22 (including branch numbers)" are "each entry of heading A through 7, 11, 18, 20 through 22".

Part 4, Part 2, and Part 3, each "the case" shall be deleted.

In Part 5, the Court of First Instance 16 ruled that the dispute over the existence or scope is reasonable" shall be construed as "the first instance court's decision that considers it reasonable to dispute over the existence or absence and the scope".

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just as this conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow