logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.15 2017고단6736
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 23, 2017, at around 00:10, the Defendant received a request from the police officer F of the police box called out after receiving a report to the effect that he/she will take the 112-way along the 1st line adjacent to a D hotel located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as “D hotel”) in front of the D hotel, and that he/she will take a sound on the road, and that he/she will move to another place after boarding the patrol vehicle.

Defendant assaulted the police officer’s head at the above police officer’s request to embark on the patrol vehicle, and assaulted the police officer’s left part of the police officer’s arms by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling and protective measures of 112 reported cases by police officers.

2. On September 23, 2017, the Defendant was arrested as a current offender on September 23, 2017 for the same crime as prescribed in paragraph 1, and was transferred to the Seoul District Court G Team in Seocho-gu Seoul District Court G Team located in 54, Seocho-gu, Seoul District Court, and was waiting to investigate the suspect.

At around 02:55 on the same day, the Defendant was asked from G of the Seoul Military Station G and its Inspector H (38 38 o) about whether or not the Defendant was healthy, and family members to contact with him, etc., and the Defendant was drinking on the left side of the said police officer, and continued drinking on the left side of the said police officer.

As a result, the above police officers received approximately three weeks of medical treatment, such as inside and outside a scopic scoppy, and at the same time interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of criminal cases by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Partial statement of the defendant in the protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. Each police statement made to F and H:

1. Each investigation report (Nos. 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 21 once a year);

1. A medical certificate for H;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to cover the damaged photo, etc. (No. 1 once a year), damaged photograph (no. 11 times a year), and to cover the CCTV images (part of No. 15 times a year) of the damaged police officer;

1. Each of the relevant Articles of the Act concerning the facts of crime;

arrow