logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.24 2017고단7542
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and a fine for 600,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 12, 2017, at the E convenience store located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, around 01:40 on September 12, 2017, the Defendant: (a) she sprinked the victim F, who was working with the above convenience store due to drinking condition, she sprinked, such as a drinkinger, and sprinked and sprinked, and took a bath for the victim on the ground that the victim did not respond thereto; and (b) dump the victim’s spherbbling, and damaged the victim’s clothes at the market price of 50,000 won

2. Violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act;

A. On September 12, 2017, around 02:00, the Defendant was arrested as a current offender for the same reasons as paragraph 1 from H District located in Seocho-gu G on September 12, 2017, and was under the influence of alcohol for about one hour and 30 minutes in the state of alcohol, took a bath, boom, and boomed.

B. At around 03:30 on the same day, the Defendant took a bath for about two hours under the influence of alcohol on the ground that he/she was transferred from the Criminal Team office of the Seocho-gu Police Station in Seocho-gu, the Seocho-gu Office to the current offender.

3. On September 12, 2017, around 03:40, the Defendant: (a) was arrested at the Criminal Team office of the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Police Station in Seocho-gu, Seoul, as an flagrant offender; (b) was transferred to the said office; and (c) took a bath; and (d) committed a scambling, such as committing a scambling; and (c) arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender.

The police officer at H 1 Team of the 1 Team of the 1 Team was assaulted by the police officer on the suppression of a crime by her booming her back one time to walk her back, thereby interfering with the legitimate execution of duties by the police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigation report (CCTV image investigation, etc.) and a investigation report (the state revocation in the H District);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of punishment (the point of damage to property, the choice of imprisonment), Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of disturbance for revocation of government official approval, the selection of fines), Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of public duties, the selection of punishment by imprisonment);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code of Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes;

arrow