logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2014.05.28 2014고단321
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 20, 2010, the Defendant appealed from the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch for the punishment of obstruction of performance of official duties, etc. on August 20, 201, the punishment of KRW 1,000,000 as a crime of obstruction of official duties, at the Daegu District Court on February 22, 201, and the punishment of KRW 1,00,00 as a crime of obstruction of official duties, at the Daegu District Court on July 21, 201, for eight months as a crime of obstruction of official duties, etc., and was sentenced to five months in imprisonment at the Daegu District Court on September 29, 201, and the Defendant appealed from the Supreme Court on September 29, 201, the same criminal records are more than eight times in addition to the revocation of detention from the Daegu District Court on October 3, 20

1. From 00:00 on December 25, 2013 to 00:02 of the same day, the Defendant interfered with his duties: (a) under the influence of alcohol on the ground that he was under the influence of alcohol for the following reasons: (b) the Defendant: (a) the Defendant was in an emergency room of the D Hospital located in the Gu and Si/Gu (U.S.); (c) the Defendant opened the body of the Maitius along with water; (d) the nurse did not undergo treatment; and (e) the nurse did not undergo treatment; and (e) the Defendant was under the influence of the victim’s nurse: (a) the Defendant was under the influence of the patient’s mental health to “hak, breath; (b) drinking alcohol; and (c) hospitalized in the emergency room; and (d) the Plaintiff was under the influence of the patient’s mental health to prevent the victim from performing his duties within 10 hours in the emergency room.”

2. The Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender with obstruction of performance of official duties by interfering with his/her duties, even though he/she was ordered to return home to the Defendant for about 50 minutes after receiving 112 reports on the ground that he/she avoided the above disturbance at the same date, time, and place as stipulated in the above paragraph (1), and by obstructing the performance of his/her duties.

The defendant, along with the above police officers, sit at the back seat of the patrol vehicle during the 112 patrol box.

arrow