logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1964. 10. 1. 선고 64다563 판결
[손해배상][집12(2)민,133]
Main Issues

The in personam effect of the farmland sales contract without proof of the location agency

Summary of Judgment

Where there is no proof of the location office in the farmland sale, the effect of the change of ownership by the sale, that is, the transfer of ownership, but the sale contract as a bond contract between the parties to the farmland sale and the parties to the transaction can be effective.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 19 of the Farmland Reform Act

Plaintiff-Appellant

000.00

Defendant-Appellee

Ministry of Home Affairs

Judgment of the lower court

Red support in the first instance court, Daejeon District Court Decision 63Na373 delivered on January 30, 1964

Text

We reverse the original judgment.

The case shall be remanded to the Daejeon District Court Panel Division.

Reasons

The court below rejected the plaintiff's main claim on the ground that the plaintiff's claim for the main claim was unnecessary to judge the remaining facts on the ground that the above sales contract was not effective since it did not obtain the certification of the location government office. However, it is nothing more than the purport of holding that where the party to the purchase and sale of farmland for which the law was applied and there is no proof of the location government office, the effect of the transfer of ownership can not occur unless it is proved by the party to the purchase and sale of farmland for which the party to the purchase and sale of farmland for which the party to the purchase and sale of the farmland for which the party to the purchase and sale of the farmland for which the party to the purchase and sale of the farmland for which the party to the purchase and sale of the farmland for which the party to the purchase and sale of the farmland for which the purchase and the party to the purchase and the party to the transaction did not have an effect of the purchase and sale of the farmland for which the party to the purchase and sale of the farmland for which the party to the purchase and the party to the purchase and sale had no legal effect.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below is reversed and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

The judge of the Supreme Court (Presiding Judge) of Hansung-do (Presiding Judge) and Kim Dong-dong and Kimchi-bak, so-called Hong-kak, the maximum lusium lusium lusium lusium lusium lab

arrow
심급 사건
-대전지방법원 1964.1.30.선고 63나373
기타문서