A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On June 7, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of interference with business, etc. in Daegu District Court racing support, and on April 19, 2019, the Defendant completed the execution of the sentence in the Third North Korean Prison on April 19, 2019. On June 18, 2019, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for a special injury in the Daegu District Court's Ansan Branch, which became final and conclusive on June 26, 2019

At around 04:25, Jun. 2, 2019, the Defendant: (a) at the Dong prison Team office of the Ansan-si, Pungsan-si, Andong-si, Pungdong-si, the Defendant 4380-23, and (b) at the Dong prison Team office of Andong-si, the Defendant was instructed by the victim C, who was the school members who transferred the Defendant to B team office, to whom he was called “I am on the sofa,” but did not comply with it; and (c) sound “I am why I am. I am. I am as soon as I am.”

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by a correctional officer who manages and supervises inmates, and at the same time, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, who is in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment, such as open standing room for the part of the following sale in need of

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement prepared by D or C;

1. Each self-written statement prepared by E;

1. Each service report;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Employee assignment table;

1. A photograph of damage and a scene of crime;

1. Before judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records, investigation reports (the period of repeated crime and confirmation of punishment being executed), and current status of accommodation of individuals;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under the latter part of Article 37 and Article 39(1) of the Criminal Code dealing with concurrent crimes was committed against correctional officials who perform the duties of confinement in prison, and the nature of the crime is bad, the degree of the injury suffered by the victim is not easy in light of the damaged photograph, etc., and the defendant is the period of repeated crime.