A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 10, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months of imprisonment for breach of trust at the Ulsan District Court on May 10, 2012, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 18, 2012.

[2012 Highest 1824]

1. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;

A. (1) On March 201, 201, the Defendant forged a private document: (a) marked the E’s official seal and G seal, which was kept in advance, on the guarantor column of the goods lease contract (for the purpose of custody of the leased person) in the office E in Gyeyang-si Office in Gyeyang-si, Yangsan-si, 201.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged one copy of the contract in G name, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

(2) On March 14, 2011, the Defendant exercised the forged contract with the head of the D Management Department H who was aware of the forgery at the D Office in Yangsan-si.

B. (1) On March 201, the Defendant forged a private document: On March 201, 201, the lessor at the office E in Yangsan-si Office: I, and the lessee: the E’s official seal and G seal previously kept in advance on the column for joint and several sureties of the goods rental contract.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged one copy of the contract in the name of G, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

(2) On March 24, 2011, the Defendant used the forged contract as if it had been duly formed with the I employee J who knew of the forgery at the I Office in Yangsan-si.

C. (1) On November 15, 201, the Defendant forged a private document, stating that the Defendant “G” was the “Representative Director G” in the column of the lender of the cash loan certificate for the K representative M at a mutually incom office near the Busan Northern apartment.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged one copy of the loan certificate in G name, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

(2) The Defendant at the same time and place as Paragraph (1) is authentic to the K representative M who is aware of the forgery.