Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

Part of the facts charged shall be revised to the extent that it does not interfere with the defendant's defense right.

The defendant filed a divorce lawsuit between the victim C (V, 39 years old) and the married couple who completed the marriage report, or was living separately.

On September 11, 2017, the Defendant, at the permanent residence of the Defendant around 06:20, experienced tobacco from the Defendant’s house to the outside of the house, and the Defendant, without the Defendant’s permission, taken the alcohol disease located in the cooling house, on the ground that “I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I am even the victim’s cell phone in order to cut off the cell phone, and caused injury to the cambage and tension of the above arms, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment because I ambling off the cell phone.”

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (Attachment of photographs);

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the defendant and his/her defense counsel may demand the victim to change his/her cell phone, but they did not have any physical contact with the victim.

① However, in this court, the victim made a statement somewhat unclear about the fact that the Defendant had drinking telegraph from the Defendant. However, in full view of the fact that the Defendant discovered the victim who was taken the cell phone and found the victim, etc., and consistently and specifically stated the fact that the victim’s arms were shaking in order to get the victim’s cell phone deducted, and ② immediately after the instant case, the Defendant supported the victim’s statement.