The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is currently in a divorce lawsuit due to the marital relationship between the victim B (math, 32) and the married couple.

Around 07:00 on April 22, 2019, the Defendant: (a) committed assault to the victim, such as putting the arms of the victim resisting the resistance at a canter and pushing the boom, while intending to force the victim’s mobile phone to cut off the victim’s mobile phone in his/her place of residence, and (b) committed assault to the victim for approximately three weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A witness B and E’s legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographic materials and investigation reports (written diagnosis submitted by the victim, a hole photograph, and a camera conversation content attached);

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act selecting a penalty, and Article 500,000 won of a fine

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,00 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion of Defendant and defense counsel under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence

1. The injured party's wife is a victim's assault of E, the birth of the injured party.

The Defendant only carried out a ditch in order not to take a Handphone of the victim. As such, even if the victim suffered some bodily injury in the process, the Defendant did not have the intention to inflict any bodily injury.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the victim was found to have been diagnosed as being damaged by the diversification of the arms under the following circumstances: (a) on April 26, 2019, in light of the fact that the victim was found to have suffered damage to the diversity of the arms under the influence of the shoulder and the arms, the divers and the diversity of the shoulder, the damage of the shoulder and the diversity of the arms; (b) on the basis of the head, buck, and buckbucks from the animals and the fact that the victim stated that he was in compliance with the head, bucks, and

It is decided as per the disposition in consideration of the fact that the victim and the defendant are divorced, the degree of damage is not significant, the victim does not want the punishment, and the defendant is the primary offender.