The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual error) did not err in inflicting an injury on the victim. However, the court below found the Defendant guilty of the part concerning the injury among the facts charged in this case. The court below erred by misapprehending the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. On August 30, 201, the lower court duly adopted and examined the following circumstances, namely, ① the victim was investigated by the police around August 30, 201, and stated that “the victim was unable to start up with the wall by cutting down the victim, and the victim was deprived of the victim to cut off the victim’s body.” On or around October 19, 201, the victim was examined by her confrontation with the Defendant, and stated that “the Defendant was unable to set off the upper body in two hands, and was closely sealed to the upper body.” On or around October 1, 2012, the victim was present in the lower court as a witness, and the victim was present in the court of first instance so that “the victim was aware of the victim’s arm’s length with the upper body, so that the victim was not able to get off the victim’s body, and that the victim was not able to get off the victim’s body and the victim’s body from the victim’s body to the point of the victim’s statement.”

3. Thus, the defendant's appeal is without merit.