logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2013.09.11 2013고정333
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant

B The Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of 2,50,000 won, and a fine of 50,000 won, respectively.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant B

A. On December 15, 2012, the Defendant had been dispatched upon receipt of a report by Jinjin Police Station G District Unit and Assistant I, for the following reasons: (a) on December 23:15, 2012, Defendant 1 and Defendant 1, who had performed the same kind of alcohol with Defendant A, who had performed the same alcohol within the Fju area E, in Jinju-si, operated by the victim D (the age of 38).

After that, on the ground that she should not see that she was "the she will not know about the defendant's appearance", she must do so, and she need to do so. As she, shea, sheathma, sheaths, and sheathly sheath, while she sheathly sheaths before she died, sheaths the her chest with her hand over three times, and shed the beer's chest on the table, with a view to threatening shed the beer's chest on the table, and shed the table and water purifiers around the table, with a view to her slopeing H.

After that, the police officer's legitimate execution of duties was obstructed by cutting down a slope I's breath breath, sticking, tearing, etc.

B. The Defendant damaged the property and caused the damage to its utility by breaking the victim D-owned tables and water purifiers at the time and time of the entry in the paragraph (a) so that the repair cost amounting to KRW 1.9 million.

2. Defendant A’s obstruction of performance of official duties interfered with the police officer’s legitimate execution of official duties, such as sloping H and slope I knife one’s two arms, and knife one’s face with hand so that Defendant B may not arrest the flagrant offender under suspicion of obstruction of performance of official duties, at the time and place of the entry into the same paragraph.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to D, H and I;

1. Each photograph;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning failure to submit a written estimate for investigation;

1. Relevant legal provisions and the choice of sentence against the crime: Defendant B: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties, the choice of fines) and the Criminal Act.

arrow