logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.08.18 2017고단705
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 술에 취해 2017. 4. 5. 21:00 경부터 광양시 C에 있는 광 양 경찰서 D 지구대에서 보호조치를 받던 중 같은 날 22:20 경 전화를 받고 온 피고인의 처에게 보호조치 경위를 설명하기 위해 위 지구대 소속 경사 E이 피고인 앞을 지나가자 발로 E의 종아리를 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of the case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Each report on internal investigation:

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (the circumstances of photographing a victim of violence);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The main sentence of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under the main sentence of Article 62-2(1) of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, Article 59(1) of the Act on the Protection, Observation, etc. of the same Act, are that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflects the instant crime, and the Defendant committed violence twice, and the circumstances unfavorable to the Defendant, such as the police officer E, who is the object of obstructing the performance of official duties, wishing to punish the Defendant, etc., and other unfavorable conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, family environment, degree of assault, degree of disturbance, and degree of interference with official duties performed by the police officer, etc.

arrow