A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 24, 2017, around 15:40 on October 24, 2017, the Defendant fell from the car before “D” clothing stores located in the Gu, Si, Si, Si, and Gu.

The police officers belonging to the police station E division of the old and American police station who received a 112 report and proposed to receive protective measures from police officers belonging to the police station E division of the old and US police station, but refused to do so and act on the road, and escorted to E division of the old and US police station E division located in the Gu and US.

At around 16:02 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) asked at one time the victim G police officer who was a police officer belonging to the above patrol group (the 28-year old-old police officer) who was the Defendant with the her bridge, to interfere with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the reported case and the protective measures; (b) at the same time, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the case and the protective measures for about 112, and caused damage to the victim’s reputation under the pretext of the 14-day treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Investigation report (to attach non-cinematographic images at a time);

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of injuries;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act was that the Defendant asked the arms of the police officer, who caused the Defendant to take protective measures under the influence of alcohol, thereby obstructing the police officer from performing his/her legitimate duties, and at the same time, inflicted an injury on the victimized police officer.

However, the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects it.

Defendant has no record of criminal punishment for violent crimes.

The Defendant agreed with the victim smoothly.

In the above circumstances, the background of the instant crime, the degree of interference with the performance of official duties, and the degree of injury, including the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime.