logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2019.09.10 2019고정306
명예훼손
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 2013, the Defendant invested KRW 100 million in the victim B as the business name for cooba, but the business did not run properly, and the victim did not return the investment money, and was willing to do so before the victim's residence.

On August 14, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 07:00 on August 14, 2018, before the entrance of the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho apartment house Mapo-gu Seoul, the Defendant filed a complaint against B resulting from the international fraud of Dhode, although the victim did not know that only he/she would obtain local authorization, or that he/she would have received investment money at the entertainment expense, (b) “B resulting from the fraud.” On the other hand, he/she received the investment money from the small-scale merchants of Korea residing in Venenaela, and only he/she could obtain local authorization, and (c) he/she received the investment money from the small-scale merchants of Korea who did not know that he/she would have obtained local authorization, and (d) the money that he/she received as the back of the original business would be replaced by the typical international malicious business morale that the investor was fluend with the young women and the young women, and (d) the investors were replaced by the doping company.

From around that time to August 30, 2018, the Defendant conducted a single-person demonstration by putting up 10 diskettes containing false facts about the victim, as shown in the attached list of crimes, in a total of 10 times.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a written complaint, a photograph of one person demonstration, a work log, and a written decision on non-prosecution;

1. Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act, the choice of a fine, inclusive, with respect to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow