The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Defendants A and B of the facts charged are between Defendant A and the victim’s family owners, who are aware of the child’s friendship with each other.

On April 16, 2014, at around 09:00, the victim visited the residence of the defendant in the Young-si District C, which was divided into visits and fences, the defendant inflicted an injury on the victim in depth 2 degrees of image that flown into the victim's bridge by inserting hot water in front of the victim in order to give coffee.

2. Determination is an offense falling under Article 266(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 266(2) of the Criminal Act. According to a written agreement bound in the trial record, the victim explicitly expressed his/her intent not to be punished on October 1, 2014, which is the date of the instant indictment. Thus, the prosecution against the Defendant is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.