The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On September 24, 2019, at around 17:00, the summary of the facts charged was delivered to the location where the victim D (the age of 19) was located if the victim D (the age of 19) was ordered from the “CPC bank for the operation of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and the Defendant.”

There is a duty of care to prevent the occurrence of danger in advance, if there is another customer who is next to the victim at the time when the distance of the seat is narrow, and the defendant has a duty of care to prevent the occurrence of danger in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and, if the dispute goes beyond the center of the victim's table end by negligence, which put the dispute into the victim's table end, and is hot, it made the nation's water over the right side, etc., so that the Defendant suffered approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim, in-depth image of the right side and the right side side.

2. Determination of applicable provisions of Acts: Judgment dismissing prosecution under Article 266 (2) of the Criminal Act: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, Article 327 subparagraph 15 of October 15, 2020, which is the case after the prosecution, in which the victim wishes to punish the defendant;