logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2015.09.04 2015고정452
업무방해등
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

The part of the facts charged of this case concerning defamation is dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was found to have been at the above hospital in order to comply with rape or indecent act by compulsion by force by the victim E, who was working in the hospital in the Goyang-dong-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, in the course of undergoing a test on the surface of the water from the victim E, who was a doctor in the hospital in the Goyang-dong-gu C.

At around 11:00 on June 2, 2014, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s medical treatment and patient management services by force, such as “Neas, Neas, Neas, E, E, and E, a feas, a friba, and E, a flab, and a flabba, and E, a dead or dead, or a dead, or a dead, or a dead, E, of the victim’s clinic in front of the victim’s clinic at the first floor of the instant hospital.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Application of each police statement statute to E and F;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Penalty of one million won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (the conversion of 100,000 won into one day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Sentence (the details and degree of the crime in this case, the defendant repents and reflects the defendant's late and late mistake, the defendant's punishment against the defendant is not imposed by agreement with the victim, the defendant is exemplary without past criminal records, and the defendant's sex, age, family relation, etc. are considered)

1. The summary of this part of the facts charged is that the Defendant, at the time and place indicated in the facts charged as indicated in the judgment, damaged the reputation of the victim E by openly pointing out false facts as follows: “The Defendant, in the presence of the reception staff of the counter, auxiliary nurses, patients waiting for medical treatment, patients waiting for medical treatment, etc.”

2. This part of the facts charged is a crime falling under Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act.

arrow