2020Nu206444 Revocation of revocation of revocation of unemployment benefits installment payments

A

Law Firm Jeonn, Attorney Park Jae-soo, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant

Attorney Kim Jong-tae

The Administrator of Busan Regional Employment and Labor Agency

Busan District Court Decision 2019Guhap454 Decided January 30, 2020

June 24, 2020

August 12, 2020

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The defendant's decision on the payment of the site for unemployment benefits to the plaintiff around February 2019 shall be revoked.

1. Quotation of the first instance judgment

The contents asserted by the Plaintiff after the judgment of the first instance to this court are not significantly different from the allegations in the first instance court. Examining the evidence duly admitted and examined by the first instance court, the fact-finding and judgment by the first instance court that the Plaintiff was unable to meet the eligibility for unemployment benefits by running the C& corporation business for profit-making purposes is justified.

Therefore, the court's explanation of this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is citing this as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

The presiding judge, the senior judge;

Judges Park Jin-ro

Judge Lee Dong-dong